Justin Posted February 8, 2015 Report Posted February 8, 2015 I finally got around to beefing up the Atari console pages this week with Tech Specs for each system, plus some other fun stuff too. The pages for Atari 2600, Atari 5200, Atari 7800, Atari Lynx, and Atari Jaguar now more granular in detail about what makes these great consoles tick. There was a lot of conflicting info out there to weed through but I think I got it mostly right. The site is still under development with lots of new things to come this year, it feels like a big accomplishment to get things like this online and off of my shoulders. For convenience I added html anchor tags at the top of each Tech Specs section of the pages. This can make it much easier for you to share a link a your friend the next time someone says "I wonder what the tech specs were on the Atari 2600" or asks "Was the Jaguar really 64-Bit?". The links will take them directly to that portion of the page without having to scroll through. Hope a few of you guys find this helpful. Enjoy! Atari 2600 Tech Specs: http://www.atari.io/atari/atari-2600/#specs Atari 5200 Tech Specs: http://www.atari.io/atari/atari-5200/#specs Atari 7800 Tech Specs: http://www.atari.io/atari/atari-7800/#specs Atari Lynx Tech Specs: http://www.atari.io/atari/atari-lynx/#specs Atari Jaguar Tech Specs: http://www.atari.io/atari/atari-jaguar/#specs More to come soon, friends Justin
Yo-Yo Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 That's nice work! I love the site but you're right that the tech specs "beef up" the atari system pages. They were good before but man that really adds a lot of substance to the page. Great job on the site, I'm excited to see what's next!
The Professor Posted February 10, 2015 Report Posted February 10, 2015 I like that we're making improvements. This community has so much potential..
Fire_In_The_Valley Posted February 13, 2015 Report Posted February 13, 2015 Yeah I'm glad you added this. I really like how clean everything looks on the page and how you present all that data. It needed to be on there, but the way you did it looks like a google page. Keep up the good work.
Justin Posted February 13, 2015 Author Report Posted February 13, 2015 Thanks! Still lots of work to do..
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.