Jump to content

RickR

Moderator
  • Posts

    11,214
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1,076

Everything posted by RickR

  1. Hint: join us in the various other forum groups. Expand your horizons and I'll bet more people will join in the TI posts.
  2. YES! I find it fitting that Mr. @RadioPoultry got the correct answer on this poultry-based game.
  3. I think that one is "Spider Fighter", although my box has darker colors.
  4. First person shooter! Comment of the month right there. Another 0.01 bonus points. Atari 2600:
  5. Maybe that's a test you can try. Encode the same video with 16 GB vs 32 GB and time it. I'll bet there will be a difference.
  6. Well, that's really not what they are measuring. They are measuring the raw speed of whatever memory you have by reading in blocks of various sizes. On your system, if you only had 16GB, that 32GB latency would be higher. But that's not a great real world test. Things would get more interesting if you tried a CPU-intensive gaming benchmark. Some games love more memory (and memory with faster timings).
  7. The "userbenchmark.com" mentioned in the "old school PC benchmarks" thread does give memory speed scores if you look at the detailed results.
  8. Well, in my work, that move from 16 to 32 GB was hugely helpful. But that included running a bunch of development environments (Eclipse, SQL Server, Microsoft .NET, etc). On my home PC, that 32 GB that I have serves no useful purpose. I've noticed a speed jump on laptops when you go from 4 to 8 GB. But I'm not sure if that's due to more memory or the fact that with two sticks, it runs in the "dual" 128 bit mode.
  9. YES! Here's the box I found. The sequel is called "Blue Max 2000", and it's TERRIBLE!
  10. Star Ship is correct (with 0.01 bonus points for the "#03"). What a cool box.
×
×
  • Create New...